MARCH 2, 2006
An
observant friend sent me this from Grist Magazine and I thought passing it on to you un-edited would be of value. Grist has a way of injecting irony and humor into the nightmare we are facing. Perhaps that is the only way to adjust or temper one's anger; but the message is the same - short term gain, long term pain.
CUTS LIKE A KNIFE, BUT IT FEELS SO WRONG
Details of environmental cuts in Bush's budget emerge
Now that the nation's water is all cleaned up, the Bush Administration has proposed sharply cutting a federal assistance Program designed to help modernize aging sewer systems and prevent Toxic runoff into streams and rivers -- from $1.35 billion in 2004 to $730 million. And now that the nation is no longer dependent on foreign oil, the Bush budget proposes a roughly 4 percent cut in Department of Energy funding for efficiency and renewable energy. With the oceans spic and span, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration faces proposed cuts of around 8.3 percent, hitting heaviest in those parts of the agency that work on ocean preservation and over fishing. The budget "limits and tames the spending appetite of the federal government," said President Bush, who has never vetoed a spending bill, and whose Medicare prescription drug benefit is now set to cost more than twice his projection of $534 billion over 10 years, a difference that could restore all the aforementioned cuts and leave several hundred billion dollars left over.
straight to the source: Los Angeles Times, Miguel Bustillo and
Kenneth R. Weiss, 09 Feb 2005
The environment is not an issue extraneous to our lives, but a central component of our long term quality of life. One day we may even accept that 75% of our medical ills are directly related to a degrading environment. Re-arranging budgetary priorities to reflect the best for the common good seems to be far off, but at home we may begin that process and see the results quicker.
--Peter